Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
AI: Jobs, Power & Money
24MAY

SAG-AFTRA wins consent rights, loses the Tilly tax

4 min read
15:19UTC

SAG-AFTRA and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers reached a tentative four-year agreement on approximately 2 May 2026, securing consent rights for every use of a performer's digital replica but failing to secure the Tilly tax: the per-use AI royalty for synthetic performers rejected outright by the studios.

← Back to Rival studies split on AI's hit to jobsJump to analysis ↓
EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

Hollywood's two largest creative unions have settled with consent protections for real performers and no compensation mechanism for AI-generated characters.

SAG-AFTRA (Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, the principal US union representing film, television, and radio performers) and the AMPTP (Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, the trade association representing major Hollywood studios and streaming companies) reached a tentative four-year agreement on approximately Saturday 2 May 2026, ahead of an 11 May deadline, with the SAG-AFTRA National Board approving the deal.

The union secured meaningful protections on the member likeness question. Consent is required for every use of a performer's digital replica, covering face swaps, voice clones, and full-body doubles; performers must be informed and compensated per use. The final agreement defines two replica categories: employment-based and independently created. The Tilly Tax, the per-use AI royalty for synthetic performers, was rejected outright by AMPTP.

The Tilly Tax was the per-use AI royalty demand for synthetic performers: AI-generated characters not based on real actors, of which Tilly Norwood became the named symbol during contract negotiations. SAG-AFTRA chief negotiator Duncan Crabtree-Ireland had framed the per-use royalty as closer to a music performance right than a one-off licence. The AMPTP rejected it. The final language restricts synthetic performer use to productions where synthetics bring "significant additional value" but attaches no monetary mechanism to that restriction. No payments flow into a union fund for AI-generated performances.

This outcome follows a pattern the Writers Guild of America established earlier. WGA reached a four-year deal that secured health fund provisions but did not secure payment for AI training use of writers' work . SAG-AFTRA's royalty fight was the best opportunity for the Tilly tax ; the union had opened that demand in April with a specific analogy to music performance rights. Studios rejected it in both cases.

The precedent arriving into Directors Guild of America (DGA) and IATSE (International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees) negotiations: consent rights for real performers are achievable; royalties for AI-generated characters are not. Working actors retain protection over their own likenesses. Synthetic characters, the AI-generated performers who require no real actor at all, are subject to a vague "significant additional value" standard with no compensation mechanism. Studios preserved their position on the category that matters most to their long-term cost structure.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

SAG-AFTRA is the main union for actors in film and television in the United States. In May 2026, it reached a four-year deal with the studios on how AI can and cannot be used with actors' likenesses. The good news for actors: studios must now get consent before using a digital copy of an actor's face, voice, or body, and must pay them each time it is used. An actor's likeness cannot be cloned without their agreement. The part the union lost: a proposed rule called the Tilly tax, which would have required studios to pay a royalty every time they used a completely AI-generated character, one not based on any real actor. Studios create these synthetic characters, and the union wanted them to cost money so they would not entirely replace human actors. The studios refused. AI-generated characters with no connection to any real person can now appear in productions without any payment to the union.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The Tilly tax's failure has a structural cause in rights architecture that the fact names but does not fully explain. Music performance rights (the analogy Crabtree-Ireland used) are built on two separate categories: the composition right (who wrote the music) and the performance right (who recorded it).

US statute, specifically the Sound Recording Act of 1971 and subsequent Copyright Act provisions, defines both categories explicitly. When radio required a new licensing category for broadcast use, there were already two established rights to build on. AI synthetic performers sit in a rights vacuum: there is no statutory performance right for a purely generative character because there is no prior recording to build a right on.

The WGA precedent is the second structural cause. Once studios demonstrated they could withstand the WGA's demand for AI training payment through the full strike threat and settlement cycle, they knew the pattern: hold the line on new AI compensation categories, accept constraints on existing ones.

SAG-AFTRA's consent demand (protection of existing rights) succeeded for the same reason the WGA's AI training demand (new rights for new use) failed: existing rights have established legal precedent; new rights require legislation or a different power dynamic.

What could happen next?
  • Precedent

    DGA and IATSE enter negotiations knowing studios will accept consent-per-use for real performers' digital replicas and will reject per-use royalties for synthetic performers; the negotiating range is already defined.

    Short term · 0.85
  • Consequence

    Synthetic performer economics improve year-on-year as model capability reduces production cost and the 'significant additional value' guardrail becomes progressively easier to satisfy.

    Medium term · 0.7
  • Precedent

    The Tilly tax's failure pushes the AI synthetic performer royalty question toward legislative action rather than collective bargaining, following the historical trajectory of music performance rights.

    Long term · 0.55
Sources:UK AI Safety Institute
Mentions:SAG-AFTRA →AMPTP →Tilly Tax →Tilly Norwood →Duncan Crabtree-Ireland →Writers Guild of America →Directors Guild of America →IATSE →United States →Ireland →
First Reported In

Update #9 · GitLab signs the manifesto, Brussels backs out

UK AI Safety Institute· 15 May 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
Caused by
BLS skips; NY Fed fills the vacuum
BLS GenAI paper absence extends past four weeks with no rescheduling, deepening measurement gap
Occurred 14 Apr 2026
Read story →
BLS still absent; NY Fed fills the gap
Paper's non-appearance alongside April employment release confirms measurement gap is now the operative fact
Occurred 23 Apr 2026
Read story →
This Event
SAG-AFTRA wins consent rights, loses the Tilly tax
With SAG-AFTRA settling and the Writers Guild of America having already settled without AI training payment, Hollywood's two largest creative unions have now both drawn the line at member likenesses while leaving the question of AI-generated character compensation entirely unresolved.
Led to
Directors open AI talks with the studios
SAG-AFTRA's four-year settlement with limited AI protections sets the precedent the DGA is negotiating against, making the DGA the next test of whether unions can win stronger terms.
Occurred 12 May 2026
Read story →
Directors settle Hollywood's AI fight weakest
SAG-AFTRA settled without a training ban or royalty, establishing the template the DGA subsequently matched.
Occurred 9 Jun 2026
Read story →
Different Perspectives
Office for National Statistics
Office for National Statistics
Deferred its Transformed Labour Force Survey beyond November 2027 and disclosed a May 2026 telephone-collection failure. The ONS carries no AI-attribution layer at all, so Britain sits outside this month's cohort of measuring states by its own admission.
Uber India, Swiggy, Zomato and Urban Company
Uber India, Swiggy, Zomato and Urban Company
Named as respondents after the Karnataka High Court extended the interim welfare-fee deposit arrangement under the state's gig-worker welfare law to Uber India on 28 July, joining the other platforms already under the same order. The companies are contesting the underlying law while complying with the interim deposit terms.
Kenya State Department for ICT and the Digital Economy
Kenya State Department for ICT and the Digital Economy
Its draft AI policy, open for consultation to 4 August, proposes a pay floor for data-annotation work, where Kenyan annotators earn $1.46 to $3.74 an hour against $21 to $27 in the US, on figures relayed by the trade outlet WeeTracker. Kenya is legislating on AI labour even though the World Bank rates it among the least exposed economies.
ARAN and Italian public-sector unions
ARAN and Italian public-sector unions
Signed the CCNL Funzioni Centrali 2025-2027 on 6 August, the first Italian national contract with a dedicated AI Title, barring fully automated employment decisions without meaningful human intervention and requiring advance union notice of AI deployment. The unions secured this through bargaining rather than waiting for legislation.
US employers reporting to Challenger, Gray & Christmas
US employers reporting to Challenger, Gray & Christmas
Named artificial intelligence as the leading stated cause of job cuts for a fifth consecutive month in July, at 33% of that month's total, even as the overall cut count fell 27%. Employers kept citing AI as the reason even as scrutiny of the attribution rose.
Bank for International Settlements
Bank for International Settlements
Bulletin 130 reports a 0.75 percentage point average unemployment rise across high-AIPI countries between 2023 and 2025, while its own footnote 2 states the index is strongly correlated with employment shares in AI-exposed sectors it is used to predict. The bulletin calls the productivity payoff uncertain and uneven.