Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
2026 FIFA World Cup
17JUN

Clean spark spread reaches €74

2 min read
10:21UTC

Germany's clean spark spread reached roughly €74/MWh on 30 June, reversing a three-week run of losses, as EUA carbon held the €80 handle at €80.17.

SportAssessed
Key takeaway

A high day-ahead lifted Germany's spark spread to €74; carbon near €80 caps the margin.

Germany's clean spark spread widened to roughly €74/MWh on 30 June, its best reading since the early-June heat series⁠1. Take the day-ahead high, subtract about €88 of gas input and €32 of carbon at a 50%-efficiency CCGT, and the gross generating margin lands there. Three weeks earlier the same spread sat near EUR -8 to -9, with CCGTs losing money on every dispatched megawatt.

The carbon leg moved too. EUA (EU Allowance) permits slipped to €79.25 on 29 June, briefly losing the €80 handle, then recovered to €80.17 on 30 June⁠2. EUA had first broken above €80 on 25 June, and holding that level keeps the carbon cost near €32/MWh.

That €32 carbon charge is what holds the German margin in check. Strip the permits out and the same day-ahead high would clear a spark spread well above €100. The reversal from three weeks of losses tracks the day-ahead rather than any fall in gas: at an unchanged €88 fuel leg, the power price alone turned the spread positive.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The clean spark spread is the profit a gas power plant earns per megawatt-hour it generates, after paying for the gas fuel and for EU carbon pollution permits. When the price of electricity is high and the price of gas and carbon is low, the spread is wide and generators make good money. When the price of electricity is low or gas and carbon are expensive, the spread can go negative, meaning operators lose money on each unit of electricity they produce. On 30 June, three things aligned to produce the widest spread since early June: electricity prices reached €195 per megawatt-hour because wind was almost absent and demand was high; gas prices stayed at €40-44 because Gulf tensions had eased; and EU carbon permits recovered to €80 per tonne. A generator burning gas to make one megawatt-hour of electricity paid about €88 for fuel and €32 for carbon permits, leaving a gross margin of about €74. Three weeks earlier, the same calculation gave a loss of €8-9 per megawatt-hour. The difference is almost entirely the electricity price: it was €70 higher on 30 June than on 8 June.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The €74 spread on 30 June required three conditions to converge simultaneously. First, €195/MWh day-ahead clearing: produced by the lowest wind week of 2026 coinciding with a summer heat surge, as documented in event 5.

Second, €40-44 TTF: the Hormuz de-escalation of 17 June drained the geopolitical risk premium and the pipeline ban binding with no snap-back left no recovery bid. Third, EUA at €80.17/tCO2: the carbon leg recovered after the €79.25 dip on 29 June, maintaining the €32/MWh carbon input that keeps the spread below what a carbon-free calculation would yield.

Remove any one condition and the spread collapses: at spring TTF of €47-52 with the same €195 day-ahead and €80 EUA, the marginal cost rises to €134-144/MWh and the spread falls to €51-61/MWh, below most fixed-O&M recovery thresholds.

At €195 power with €44 gas but EUA at €70, the carbon leg falls to €28/MWh, reducing marginal cost by €4/MWh and boosting the spread to €78, a minor change that confirms gas price, not carbon, is the dominant spread driver in the current €40-44 TTF regime.

First Reported In

Update #22 · Germany refills as the autumn cliff nears

euenergy.live· 30 Jun 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
French Football Federation
French Football Federation
The FFF called an 11:00 CEST press conference for 28 July, at its Paris headquarters, following an extraordinary executive committee meeting, at which Zinedine Zidane is expected to be presented as head coach succeeding Didier Deschamps. As of this writing no communique confirms the appointment, contract length or start date.
Morocco
Morocco
Morocco is pushing for the 2030 final at its Grand Stade Hassan II in Casablanca, a planned 115,000-seat venue that would be the world's largest football stadium on completion. The venue is contested by a Spanish petition for the Santiago Bernabeu, and FIFA has fixed neither the venue nor the tournament's proposed 64-team format.
FIFA
FIFA
FIFA's first tournament report, published 27 July, itemises nearly 300,000 accredited personnel, 73,700 security staff and 300,000 square metres of custom-grown turf, with no revenue or cost figure attached. As a Swiss association answering to its own Congress rather than a treasury, FIFA has followed the same operational-before-financial sequence it used after Qatar 2022.
Javier Tebas / La Liga
Javier Tebas / La Liga
La Liga president Javier Tebas said on 21 July that FIFA's system is rotten from the root and that Gianni Infantino's time as president has, in his words, concluded. Tebas has no vote in FIFA's process, so days after the IOC declined jurisdiction over a separate ethics complaint, he used the only instrument he has.
Mexico City government
Mexico City government
Head of government Clara Brugada presented a closing report on 22 July crediting the tournament with 44 billion pesos of economic activity, 2,000-plus accelerated public works and 100,000 formal jobs in June alone. The city has not published the method behind that figure, and three other Mexican bodies count the same five weeks differently.
Town of Foxborough
Town of Foxborough
Foxborough answered Kraft Group's June lawsuit on 7 July with a 61-page counterclaim, calling the stadium's owners 'a collection of multibillion-dollar corporations' trying to shift its $7.8 million security bill onto taxpayers. The town says its licensing power and its billing power run through the same board, and it wants the court to award its own costs too.