Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Starship HLS
TechnologyUS

Starship HLS

SpaceX Human Landing System for Artemis III; two years behind schedule per OIG IG-26-004.

Last refreshed: 7 April 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic

Key Question

Why is Artemis III not landing on the Moon as originally planned?

Timeline for Starship HLS

#1011 Apr

Documented by OIG audit IG-26-004 as at least two years behind schedule for mid-2027 docking

Artemis II Moon Mission: Isaacman pledges 2028 Moon landing date
View full timeline →
Common Questions
Why is the Artemis III Moon landing delayed?
NASA's OIG report IG-26-004 found SpaceX's Starship HLS approximately two years behind schedule. NASA redesigned Artemis III as a lunar orbit demonstration and deferred the landing.Source: NASA OIG IG-26-004
What is Starship HLS?
A modified SpaceX Starship vehicle selected in 2021 to land NASA astronauts on the Moon for Artemis III.
Does NASA have a backup if Starship HLS keeps slipping?
No backup lander is under contract. The Artemis architecture relies solely on Starship HLS for the lunar surface.Source: NASA OIG
How does Starship HLS get to the Moon?
It requires orbital propellant transfer in Earth orbit before trans-lunar injection, a procedure SpaceX was still developing as of early 2026.

Background

Starship HLS is the SpaceX-built Human Landing System selected by NASA in April 2021 to carry Artemis III astronauts from lunar orbit to the surface. NASA's Office of Inspector General report IG-26-004 found the system to be approximately two years behind schedule relative to the original Artemis III landing target. Following the schedule slip, NASA's Artemis III mission was redesigned around a lunar orbit demonstration rather than a landing, with the surface landing deferred to a later mission. A LEO lander demonstration has been added to the manifest to retire risk before the lunar surface attempt.

Starship HLS is a derivative of SpaceX's full-stack Starship vehicle, modified for lunar landing with a crew elevator and adapted propulsion for the airless lunar environment. The architecture requires orbital propellant transfer in Earth orbit before trans-lunar injection — a procedure SpaceX was still developing and testing as of early 2026. NASA's contract is fixed-price.

The delay carries significant programmatic weight: the Artemis architecture was designed around a single commercial lander. No backup lander is under contract. If Starship HLS further slips, there is no alternative PATH to the lunar surface under the current programme plan. The FY2027 NASA budget protects Artemis funding while cutting Science, suggesting the administration has chosen to absorb the HLS delay rather than contract alternatives.