
Section 206 show-cause
FERC tool compelling RTOs to justify existing tariffs or propose reforms before any binding rule takes effect.
Last refreshed: 28 June 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic
Why did FERC choose show-cause orders rather than a direct rule, and what does it mean for data-centre timelines?
Timeline for Section 206 show-cause
Mentioned in: FERC sets a 20 July adequacy deadline
Data Centres: Boom and BacklashFERC delays its grid rule to 2027
Data Centres: Boom and BacklashWhat is a Section 206 show-cause order from FERC?
Why did FERC use show-cause orders instead of issuing a rule for data-centre grid connections in 2026?
When will FERC's show-cause process produce a binding rule for large-load grid connections?
Background
FERC used Section 206 on 18 June 2026 to send show-cause orders to all six US grid operators (RTOs) rather than issue the large-load connection rule it had promised for end-June. Each RTO must prove its existing tariff is just and reasonable, or propose reforms, across five areas: co-location terms, large-load definitions, queue priority, cost allocation, and reliability obligations. Resource-adequacy reports are due 20 July, show-cause responses 17 August, and public comments 16 September. Industry lawyers estimate six to eighteen months from a show-cause order to a final FERC order, pushing any binding standard on large-load connections to 2027 at the earliest.
Section 206 of the Federal Power Act gives FERC authority to investigate whether a utility's rates, terms, or conditions are unjust, unreasonable, or unduly discriminatory, and to order changes. Unlike direct rulemaking, which FERC initiates itself, Section 206 places the burden of proof on the existing tariff holder to justify current arrangements. This procedural posture explains why show-cause extends the timeline rather than compressing it: FERC can let six separate proceedings run simultaneously, collecting evidence before writing a national rule, rather than defending a single standard through immediate appellate litigation. The mechanism was used in earlier interconnection reform cycles, including the run-up to FERC Order 2003 in 2003, which took three years from proceeding to adopted rule.