
National Coalition on Black Civic Participation v. Wohl
Federal case finding 2020 robocalls broke the Voting Rights Act intimidation clause.
Last refreshed: 27 October 2026
Timeline for National Coalition on Black Civic Participation v. Wohl
Mentioned in: DSCC asks judge to fast-track its suit
US Midterms 2026Background
National Coalition on Black Civic Participation v. Wohl, No. 20 Civ. 8668 in the Southern District of New York, is a leading case on Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act, the clause that bars intimidating voters. On 8 March 2023 Judge Victor Marrero granted summary judgment on liability against Jacob Wohl, Jack Burkman and their firms, finding that a summer 2020 robocall sent to about 85,000 numbers, warning that mail voting would expose voters to police, debt collectors and vaccine tracking, broke Section 11(b) and the Ku Klux Klan Act. New York's attorney general had joined the suit.
It is the precedent behind the Section 11(b) claim in DSCC v. Trump, although that suit targets federal officials rather than private operatives.
What did the court decide in NCBCP v. Wohl?
What did the Wohl and Burkman robocall say?
Why is NCBCP v. Wohl cited in DSCC v. Trump?
Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Updated 27 October 2026. Editorial standards.