Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Matthew King
Person

Matthew King

JRC Head of Unit for Digital and Data Sovereignty; Commission research arm's lead on sovereignty measurement.

Last refreshed: 23 April 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic

Key Question

How does the JRC actually measure European digital sovereignty progress?

Timeline for Matthew King

View full timeline →
Common Questions
What does the Joint Research Centre do on digital sovereignty?
The JRC's Digital and Data Sovereignty unit produces independent scientific assessments of European technology dependency and measures progress against EU digital sovereignty objectives. It provides the empirical evidence base supporting Commission policy decisions on cloud, AI, and data sovereignty.Source: European Commission JRC

Background

Matthew King is Head of Unit for Digital and Data Sovereignty at the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission's in-house science and knowledge service. He was listed as a speaker at the inaugural Sovereign Tech Europe summit in Brussels on 23 April 2026 .

The JRC provides independent scientific evidence to support EU policymaking. Its Digital and Data Sovereignty unit produces empirical assessments of European technology dependency, data flow governance, and the measurable dimensions of digital sovereignty — including metrics for tracking progress against EU targets. This research function is distinct from DG CNECT (policy) and DG COMP (enforcement): the JRC's REMIT is to provide the evidentiary base that informs both.

King's unit's work is relevant to the central tension in European sovereignty policy: the gap between declared objectives and measurable delivery. The Draghi Report found only 11.2% of its recommendations implemented one year on; the JRC's sovereignty measurement frameworks are one instrument for tracking whether procurement decisions, regulatory actions, and funding flows actually reduce European digital dependency. His summit participation places empirical sovereignty research alongside the policy and industry voices arguing over definitions.