Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Mario Mariniello
AI-generated editorial illustration
PersonBE

Mario Mariniello

A Bruegel economist specialising in EU technology and competition policy.

Last refreshed: 16 July 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic

Key Question

If EU cloud has 15% of its home market, can nationality-based procurement rules actually close that gap?

Timeline for Mario Mariniello

#101 Jun

Argued the June sovereignty package uses nationality as a proxy for security

European Tech Sovereignty: Bruegel says EU sovereignty mimics rivals
View full timeline →
Common Questions
What is Bruegel's critique of EU digital sovereignty policy?
Bruegel economist Mario Mariniello argued in June 2026 that Europe's sovereignty package uses nationality as a proxy for security, mimicking rivals while EU cloud market share stays near 15%. Legal mandates for EU-owned providers do not automatically close the supply-side gap they identify.Source: Bruegel
What share of the European cloud market do EU providers hold?
EU cloud providers hold roughly 15% of their home market, according to Bruegel analysis cited in June 2026. The rest is held primarily by US hyperscalers including Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud.Source: Bruegel
Who is Mario Mariniello and what does he study?
Mario Mariniello is a research fellow at Bruegel, the Brussels economics think-tank. He specialises in EU technology policy, digital markets regulation and the interaction between competition law and industrial policy.Source: Bruegel

Background

Mario Mariniello is a research fellow and economist at Bruegel, the Brussels-based international economics think-tank specialising in EU economic and technology policy. His research focuses on how EU competition law and technology regulation interact with industrial policy, addressing digital markets regulation, the AI Act and the structural conditions for European technology competitiveness.

In June 2026 Mariniello published an analysis arguing that Europe's digital sovereignty package uses "nationality as a proxy for security", mimicking the US and Chinese approach while the EU's home cloud market share remains near 15%. The critique, reported by Lowdown, argued that legal mandates for sovereign procurement do not automatically generate the supply-side capacity to fulfil them.

The June 2026 analysis was his most prominent intervention in the sovereignty debate: placing a quantitative anchor (15% cloud share) against a policy architecture that had been largely qualitative. The argument does not reject the sovereignty agenda but questions its current form. Mandating nationality-based procurement rules, Mariniello's case runs, selects for EU ownership rather than for the security properties those rules purport to guarantee. A European cloud provider with weak security architecture is not more sovereign than a US provider that meets the technical requirements; the proxy substitutes legal origin for substantive assessment. Whether Brussels refines its sovereignty instruments to address this critique is a question the June 2026 package leaves open.

Source Material