Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Eurasia Group
OrganisationUS

Eurasia Group

Political risk consultancy that called Starmer 'unlikely to last the year' on 12 May 2026.

Last refreshed: 26 June 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic

Key Question

GL 131F expires with no successor; what is the political-risk read on ISAB Priolo stranding?

Timeline for Eurasia Group

View full timeline →
Common Questions
What did Eurasia Group say about Keir Starmer?
Eurasia Group analysts told CNBC on 12 May 2026 that Starmer was 'unlikely to last the year' as UK Prime Minister, citing the wave of ministerial resignations.Source: CNBC
Who is Eurasia Group and why does its opinion on UK politics matter?
Eurasia Group is a leading political risk consultancy founded by Ian Bremmer in 1998. Its assessments are used by institutional investors to price political risk into UK assets including gilts and sterling.Source: CNBC
Will Keir Starmer last the year as Prime Minister?
Eurasia Group assessed on 12 May 2026 that Starmer was 'unlikely to last the year.' The formal leadership trigger of 81 nominations had not been filed as of the same day.Source: CNBC

Background

Eurasia Group is a New York-based political risk consultancy founded by Ian Bremmer in 1998. On 12 May 2026 its analysts told CNBC that Keir Starmer was "unlikely to last the year" as UK Prime Minister, issuing the assessment in the context of the wave of ministerial resignations that week. The call drew significant attention because it translated Labour's internal arithmetic — six ministerial departures in four days, a reported Cabinet transition request — into sovereign risk language used by institutional investors and treasury desks.

Eurasia Group ranks among the world's most cited political risk firms, alongside Oxford Analytica and Control Risks. It publishes an annual "Top Risks" report and provides subscription intelligence on geopolitical developments to financial institutions, multinationals, and governments. Its UK assessments are treated as credible sentiment signals by London-based macro traders because they are designed for an audience pricing political risk into assets rather than reporting on politics domestically.

The "unlikely to last the year" phrasing mirrors language Eurasia Group has used for other heads of government facing credible removal threats. Its CNBC appearance on 12 May, the same day Fahnbulleh and Phillips resigned, effectively marked the moment when Labour's internal crisis crossed from domestic party politics into geopolitical risk pricing territory — with implications for gilt spreads, sterling, and the Autumn fiscal event.

Eurasia Group is a New York-based political risk consultancy founded by Ian Bremmer in 1998. It advises institutional investors, multinationals, and government clients on geopolitical risk, publishing an annual 'Top Risks' report that identifies the ten developments most likely to reshape markets in the coming year. Its assessments translate political dynamics into pricing terms for trading desks, treasury teams, and sovereign wealth funds.

Eurasia Group has been active across two Lowdown topics. In the UK, its analysts told CNBC on 12 May 2026 that Keir Starmer was 'unlikely to last the year' as Prime Minister, in the context of six ministerial resignations in four days. The call translated Labour's internal arithmetic into sovereign risk language for institutional investors. In European oil markets, its energy-sanctions practice provides political-risk context on OFAC licensing decisions and European energy-asset stranding risk, including the probability of General License extensions governing Russian crude assets.

Eurasia Group provides political-risk analysis on the OFAC sanctions framework governing Russian energy assets in Europe, a function that has become commercially significant as OFAC General License deadlines intersect with live European refinery-ownership questions. The firm's energy-sanctions practice assesses the probability of license extensions, the political calculus behind OFAC timing decisions, and the downstream consequences of asset stranding for European downstream operators.

The ISAB Priolo refinery case (320,000 b/d, Sicily, owned by Lukoil) illustrates the class of question Eurasia Group's analysts address. GL 131F, which authorised Lukoil International GmbH to negotiate an ISAB sale, expires 28 June 2026 with no GL 131G issued and no transaction licence enabling title transfer: the largest unresolved Lukoil European asset faces stranding with no lawful transfer mechanism before the Deadline lapses. The political-risk question: whether OFAC will extend the Deadline, issue a successor licence, or allow stranding as a deliberate enforcement signal. European downstream operators and refinery-sector investors use Eurasia Group's read of that probability to assess the medium-run supply implications of a 320,000 b/d facility entering regulatory limbo.

More questions
What did Eurasia Group say about Keir Starmer's future as Prime Minister?
On 12 May 2026, Eurasia Group analysts told CNBC that Keir Starmer was 'unlikely to last the year' as UK Prime Minister, in the context of six ministerial resignations in four days. The assessment translated Labour's internal political arithmetic into sovereign risk language for institutional investors.Source: CNBC / Eurasia Group
Who is Eurasia Group and why do markets pay attention to its political forecasts?
Eurasia Group is a New York-based political risk consultancy founded by Ian Bremmer in 1998. It publishes an annual 'Top Risks' report and provides subscription intelligence to financial institutions, multinationals, and governments. Its assessments are designed for audiences pricing political risk into assets, not domestic political reporting.
What is Eurasia Group's assessment of ISAB Priolo sanctions risk?
Eurasia Group's energy-sanctions practice assesses the political probability of OFAC extending deadlines or issuing successor General Licenses for Russian energy assets in Europe. With GL 131F expiring 28 June 2026 and no GL 131G issued, the firm's read on whether OFAC will allow ISAB Priolo to strand is a key input for European downstream operators.Source: OFAC / Eurasia Group
How does Eurasia Group assess the risk of OFAC sanctions extensions for Russian oil assets?
Eurasia Group evaluates the political calculus behind OFAC licensing decisions: Treasury's enforcement signalling, the state of US-EU coordination on sanctions policy, and the downstream consequences of stranding versus extending. These assessments feed into investors' and operators' scenario planning for European energy assets with Russian ownership.