Skip to content
Ayuntamiento CDMX
OrganisationMX

Ayuntamiento CDMX

Mexico City municipal government; delayed rent-cap legislation, unanswered on Airbnb injunction.

Last refreshed: 17 April 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic

Key Question

Will Mexico City reinstate rent protections after the World Cup or permanently defer them?

Timeline for Ayuntamiento CDMX

View full timeline →
Common Questions
What is Mexico City doing about Airbnb and housing?
Mexico City enacted a 180-day annual STR cap in October 2024. By April 2026, it had not responded to Airbnb's injunction against the cap, and proposed rent-cap legislation was formally delayed until after the 2026 World Cup.Source: Vallarta Daily / Mexico News Daily
How much did Mexico City increase residency visa fees?
Mexico City's residency fees doubled effective 1 January 2026: the one-year temporary residency rose from 5,328 to 11,140.74 Mexican pesos, a 109% increase.Source: Diario Oficial de la Federación

Background

Mexico City's municipal government (Ayuntamiento CDMX, formally the Gobierno de la Ciudad de México) is facing incompatible pressures over short-term rental policy ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup. It enacted a 180-day annual STR cap in October 2024 to contain displacement pressure, then delayed proposed rent-cap legislation until after the World Cup ends, and has yet to respond to Airbnb's injunction against the 180-day cap.

Mexico City is governed by Claudia Sheinbaum's political successor, following Sheinbaum's election as President of Mexico in June 2024. The city government navigates between a housing movement that spent a year winning the STR cap and a tourism and hospitality sector that sees the World Cup as an unrepeatable revenue event. The accommodation arithmetic is real: 61,500 hotel rooms against 5.5 million anticipated visitors creates a structural gap that platforms currently fill.

Mexico City also doubled most residency-visa fees effective 1 January 2026. The one-year temporary residency rose from 5,328 to 11,140.74 Mexican pesos (a 109% jump), with no operational guidance issued on how to claim the 50% reduction available on paper for family reunification and job offers. The dual moves, STR cap and fee doubling, suggest a city government extracting revenue from its mobile foreign-resident base while deferring the harder political choices on displacement until after the tournament.