Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
US Midterms 2026
12APR

Fellowship PAC Shows Zero in Federal Filings

2 min read
15:24UTC

Fellowship PAC still shows zero dollars in FEC filings despite claiming $100 million raised. The Q1 2026 disclosure is due 15 April, three days from today.

← Back to First votes exceed every forecastJump to analysis ↓
PoliticsDeveloping
Key takeaway

The 15 April FEC filing will reveal whether Fellowship PAC's $100 million claim has any basis in federal records.

Fellowship PAC still shows $0 in FEC filings despite publicly claiming $100 million raised . The Q1 2026 quarterly report is due 15 April, three days from today. If that filing shows zero again, the claim remains entirely unsupported by federal records 1.

The PAC is chaired by Jesse Spiro, a Tether US executive. Its registered finance director, Mitchell Nobel, works for Cantor Fitzgerald, which custodies Tether's reserves. The personnel connections to the stablecoin industry are direct.

Three explanations persist. The money does not exist, and the public claims function as influence projection without actual spending. The money exists but is structured below reporting thresholds or routed through intermediaries with their own delayed disclosure cycles. Or contributions were received after the previous filing period and will appear in the Q1 report. The 15 April filing will narrow these possibilities. Any reported contributions would reveal donor identity for the first time; continued silence would make the $100 million claim increasingly difficult to take at face value.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Fellowship PAC is a political action committee connected to the cryptocurrency industry, led by Jesse Spiro (an executive at Tether, a major crypto company) and Mitchell Nobel (an executive at Cantor Fitzgerald, a major Wall Street firm). It has publicly claimed to have raised $100 million to spend on the 2026 elections. The problem: federal election records show the PAC has received exactly $0 in contributions. This is not a small discrepancy , the entire publicly claimed amount is absent from official records. Political action committees are legally required to report contributions above $200 to the Federal Election Commission. If Fellowship PAC had actually received $100 million, those contributions would appear in public records. The Q1 2026 filing due in mid-April is the next opportunity for any contributions to appear. If it shows $0 again, the $100 million claim has no federal evidence to support it.

Sources:Federal Election Commission
Mentions:Mitchell Nobel →FEC →Jesse Spiro →Tether →Cantor Fitzgerald →Fellowship PAC →
First Reported In

Update #2 · First votes exceed every forecast

Federal Election Commission· 12 Apr 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
This Event
Fellowship PAC Shows Zero in Federal Filings
A second consecutive $0 quarterly filing would confirm that the PAC's $100 million claim is either political theatre or structured through intermediaries designed to avoid disclosure.
Led to
Fellowship PAC: $11m filed, $89m missing
Fellowship PAC's prior $0 filings (ID:2280) set the expectation that the 15 April Q1 filing would resolve the $100M claim, and the $11M disclosure directly updates that finding.
Occurred 15 Apr 2026
Read story →
Different Perspectives
Labour-market economists
Labour-market economists
Economists note June payrolls rose just 57,000, about half the forecast 115,000, with April and May revised down further. They call it the only development this week bearing directly on how incumbents can run on the economy in November.
Alaska political observers
Alaska political observers
The state Supreme Court's reinstatement of Dan J. Sullivan of Petersburg to the 18 August primary ballot means two men named Dan Sullivan, one the sitting senator, may both appear. Observers moved the race to Toss-up on the ballot mechanics alone, not any shift in the campaign.
OpenSecrets campaign-finance analysts
OpenSecrets campaign-finance analysts
Analysts flag that all four national committees, the NRSC included, can now form joint fundraising committees combining donor money with full coordination. They expect the DSCC, NRCC and DCCC to match the move before the effect shows up in filings.
NRSC strategists
NRSC strategists
The NRSC told campaigns on 30 June to fold independent spending into fully coordinated vehicles now that the Supreme Court has struck the caps. Strategists see it as converting the RNC's roughly $110m cash edge into leverage precisely where challengers are outspending Republican incumbents.
Democracy Docket / voting-rights litigators
Democracy Docket / voting-rights litigators
Litigators note DOJ is now 0-for-6 on trial losses yet still climbing the appellate ladder through the Sixth Circuit en banc bid. They read the persistence itself as the point: keep the underlying dispute alive past November regardless of the win rate.
Fulton County election officials
Fulton County election officials
Fulton County had argued in court that the subpoena was meant to "target, harass and punish" perceived opponents, and the 7 July ruling ended that specific demand. Officials treat the outcome as proof the criminal track was pressure, not a genuine prosecution.