Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
UK Startups and Innovation
24AUG

UK Horizon Europe share rebounds to 9.3%

3 min read
16:40UTC

DSIT data published on 5 June show the UK's Horizon Europe funding share rose to 9.3% in 2024 from 5.8% a year earlier, with the applied-research strand up 68%, a genuine recovery that still sits below the pre-Brexit peak.

TechnologyDeveloping
Key takeaway

UK Horizon Europe recovery is real and feeds the spinout pipeline, but sits below the 2018/19 peak.

DSIT published UK participation figures for the EU's Horizon Europe research programme on Friday 5 June. The UK's share of funding won rose to 9.3% in 2024, from 5.8% in 2023, worth €994m, with its share of proposals climbing from 18.9% to 24.1%. The department described the result as a partial recovery toward late Horizon 2020 levels, still below the 2018/19 peak. 1

Horizon Europe is the EU's flagship research programme; the UK re-associated in 2024 after Brexit exclusion. The sharpest move sits in Pillar 2, the strand funding industrial and applied collaborative research that feeds university tech-transfer offices and spinouts. The UK's Pillar 2 share rose 68% year on year, from 3.7% to 6.2%. The part of the recovery most likely to surface later as commercial IP is also the part growing fastest.

DSIT's own framing keeps the ceiling in view. Re-association has reopened the collaborative-funding pipe, but it is not yet running at pre-Brexit volume. The France science alliance signed in May is the bilateral hedge that runs alongside the multilateral programme, a second channel for the same collaborative research while Horizon participation climbs back toward where it was.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Horizon Europe is the European Union's main research funding programme, with a total budget of roughly €95bn for 2021-2027. The UK was excluded from it after Brexit until re-association in early 2024. In 2023, the UK's share of Horizon funding was 5.8%. In 2024, it recovered to 9.3%, meaning UK researchers won €994m of grants. The applied-research strand (Pillar 2) recovered fastest, growing 68% year-on-year. However, DSIT itself describes this as a partial recovery: before Brexit, the UK had a larger share. Getting back to pre-Brexit levels requires winning a higher proportion of the proposals that UK researchers are submitting, which depends partly on Brussels relationships that were disrupted during three years of exclusion.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Pillar 2 (industrial research consortia) recovered faster than Pillar 1 (curiosity-driven ERC) for structural reasons. Pillar 2 projects involve industrial consortia where UK companies remain commercially attractive partners regardless of political status. A German automotive manufacturer running a battery electrolyte consortium has direct commercial reasons to include a UK material-science team even under associate rules.

ERC individual grants differ: UK researchers compete head-to-head against EU nationals in peer-review panels where the 2021-2023 exclusion period broke the informal network ties that referees use to assess applicants. Rebuilding those networks takes the length of a grant cycle, roughly 5-7 years, which is why the Pillar 1 recovery lags.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Pillar 2 grants awarded in 2024 will produce commercial IP and spinout companies in 2029-2032. The 68% year-on-year growth means the UK spinout pipeline from Horizon is growing again after a four-year gap.

  • Risk

    The UK's 24.1% proposal share suggests strong research intent but a still-recovering award conversion rate. If consortium-formation biases persist, the actual funding return may plateau before recovering to pre-Brexit levels.

First Reported In

Update #7 · OQC's £260m sets European quantum record

UK Tech News· 7 Jun 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
UK Horizon Europe share rebounds to 9.3%
The 68% jump in Pillar 2 is a leading indicator for future UK tech transfer and spinout volume, rather than a diplomatic recovery metric.
Different Perspectives
Highland Europe
Highland Europe
Highland Europe, the growth-equity firm behind a €1bn-plus fund, took €65m from the British Business Bank into its Technology Growth Fund VI on 30 July via British Patient Capital. For a Geneva-based growth investor, the Bank's cheque is routine cornerstone capital, unrelated to which Whitehall department currently claims to sponsor UKRI.
Integrity Growth Partners
Integrity Growth Partners
The Los Angeles firm put £16.1m into Prevalent AI on 24 August, the London GCHQ-alumni company's first outside capital, specifically to fund its US expansion. Its stake is a single commercial bet on one UK deep-tech founder's American growth, not a comment on which department UKRI answers to this month.
Temasek
Temasek
Temasek led PhysicsX's Series C on 30 July, into which the British Business Bank put $25m through British Growth Partnership Fund I. State-backed pension capital rides behind a foreign-led growth round while UK weekly tech funding fell 72% to £102.95m across nine rounds three weeks later.
Innovate UK's Women in Innovation cohort
Innovate UK's Women in Innovation cohort
Sixty-one founders won £75,000 grants from Innovate UK on 5 August, the programme's largest-ever cohort, with a further 39 highly commended founders taking support without cash. For these founders the sponsorship dispute over UKRI's parent department is academic: the money and mentoring arrived exactly as scheduled.
Financial Conduct Authority
Financial Conduct Authority
The FCA added five fintechs, ClearScore, Modulr, Teya, Urban Jungle and Zilch, to its Scale-up Unit on 7 August, the first cohort it regulates solely rather than jointly with the Prudential Regulation Authority. The unit's expansion is a routine regulatory build-out running on its own timetable, unconnected to the sponsorship dispute over its sister department UKRI.
Cabinet Office
Cabinet Office
The Cabinet Office ran the DSIT-to-BIST transfer as a standard cross-government machinery change, the kind gov.uk pages and framework documents routinely take months to catch up with after any department is abolished or renamed. Officials treat the paperwork lag as administrative sequencing, not dysfunction: funding and grant-approval layers moved first because they had to keep working.