Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
UK Local Elections 2026
10APR

Candidate Database Jumps From 2.6% to 86% in Three Days

2 min read
18:20UTC

Democracy Club's candidate database went from covering 81 of 3,074 areas to 2,636 in the three days following English and Welsh Statement of Persons Nominated publication. Scotland hit 100 per cent. Volunteer verification of imported records continues; the North East lags at 39 per cent entered.

PoliticsDeveloping
Key takeaway

SoPN publication closed the candidate data gap, making England and Wales candidate-level analysis viable for the first time.

Democracy Club's candidate database stood at 2.6 per cent coverage, 81 of 3,074 areas, on 7 April 2026 . By 10 April, following English and Welsh Statement of Persons Nominated publication on 9 and 10 April, the database covered 86 per cent: 2,636 areas. Scotland reached 100 per cent before the English and Welsh SoPNs published. The three-day movement represents the largest single data discontinuity in this briefing cycle.

SoPN publication is the mechanism by which returning officers publish the final candidate list for each seat; until it publishes, no authoritative count exists. SoPN publication is the mechanism by which returning officers publish the final list of standing candidates for each seat; until it publishes, no authoritative count of candidates exists. Democracy Club's volunteer network ingests the published documents, enters the data, and double-checks it. As of 10 April, 2,068 areas have candidate data entered and 1,457 are double-checked. The 611 entered-but-not-checked gap represents records awaiting verification, not missing data.

North East England at 39 per cent entered is the most significant regional lag. North East England's 39 per cent entry rate follows a volunteer density pattern: Democracy Club is volunteer-driven, and data entry speed tracks the geographic distribution of its network. The North East has historically had lower volunteer coverage than London and the South East. For any analysis that depends on complete candidate-level data in the North East, the verification lag matters.

The practical consequence is that candidate-level analysis across England and Wales is now viable for the first time this campaign. Cross-referencing the Democracy Club database with party membership data, previous electoral performance, and candidate demographics becomes possible. For Reform UK specifically, the SoPN data reveals where candidate lists are complete and where attrition has shortened them below the six-member maximum in Welsh constituencies.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

When a UK election is called, every candidate who wants to stand must submit official paperwork by a set deadline. Once that deadline passes, the returning officer in each area publishes a list of everyone who is actually on the ballot. This document is called the Statement of Persons Nominated, or SoPN. Democracy Club is a volunteer-run organisation that collects all these lists and builds a single searchable database of every candidate across the whole country. Before the SoPNs are published, they can only estimate who might be standing. After publication, they know for certain. On 7 April, Democracy Club had processed lists for just 81 out of 3,074 areas, covering about 2.6 per cent of the country. By 10 April, after England and Wales published their lists on 9 and 10 April, that jumped to 2,636 areas, or 86 per cent. Scotland had already reached 100 per cent. This matters because it means for the first time this campaign, you can see the complete picture of who is actually standing, which parties are fielding full slates, and where there are gaps.

First Reported In

Update #2 · New Money Rules, Old Party Fractures

Democracy Club· 10 Apr 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Candidate Database Jumps From 2.6% to 86% in Three Days
The SoPN data surge closes the structural gap that made candidate-level analysis unreliable until now; verification quality rather than coverage is the remaining variable, with the North East's 39 per cent entry rate the most significant outstanding lag.
Different Perspectives
Welsh Government (Plaid Cymru under Rhun ap Iorwerth)
Welsh Government (Plaid Cymru under Rhun ap Iorwerth)
Plaid's Cardiff minority government relies on Green confidence-and-supply with no written agreement, the same arrangement that collapsed in Scotland in 2023. Green Westminster polling fell from 17% to 15% in two weeks as Greens took governing responsibility; whether that deflation reaches Cardiff is the near-term test for ap Iorwerth's majority.
Reform-run English county councils (Essex, Suffolk, Norfolk)
Reform-run English county councils (Essex, Suffolk, Norfolk)
Essex named a City-trained efficiency lead over a budget where statute has already committed roughly 98% of spend; Suffolk simultaneously issued a pre-action letter against the reorganisation that will dissolve it. Reform-controlled authorities are spending public money on litigation their own sector lawyers expect to fail while their DOGE units face statutory constraints they cannot override.
Scottish Government (SNP under John Swinney)
Scottish Government (SNP under John Swinney)
Swinney rested the 72-55 Holyrood mandate on the combined SNP-Green bloc rather than his own party's 58 seats, seven short of the trigger he named; he has publicly conceded he has no plan if Westminster holds its veto. The constitutional argument is made; the enforcement route does not exist.
UK Government (MHCLG and Downing Street)
UK Government (MHCLG and Downing Street)
MHCLG has until 12 June to respond to Suffolk's pre-action letter and faces three further counties at the same stage; Downing Street rejected Holyrood's Section 30 demand as a spokesperson lobby line rather than a written statement, declining to open formal inter-governmental correspondence. Both decisions compress Reform's two main legal challenges into the same two-week window.
UK Government (Labour)
UK Government (Labour)
Westminster framed the youth justice transfer as a culmination of prior work rather than a precedent, refused a Section 30 order before the request arrived, and omitted both the Representation of the People Bill and any Wales Bill from the 13 May King's Speech. Starmer is described as open to a devolved-leaders summit in June.
Reform UK
Reform UK
Essex, Norfolk and Suffolk filed pre-action protocol letters framing their LGR challenge as mandate-consistent, while 22 Reform councillors departed in 14 days at an annualised rate nearly three times the 10 percent projection. Richard Tice defended the Harborne 5 million pound gift as unconditional, with no acknowledgement of Farage's two contradictory accounts on record.