Skip to content
Drones: Industry & Defence
19MAR

Pulsar jammer unveiled in Riyadh

3 min read
08:30UTC

A tripod-mounted electronic warfare system unveiled at Riyadh's World Defense Show targets Gulf states facing sustained drone bombardment — and pairs with the C2 platform the Pentagon just adopted.

← Back to UK startup tops Pentagon's drone gauntletJump to analysis ↓
TechnologyDeveloping
Key takeaway

Pulsar's Riyadh debut exploits compressed Gulf procurement cycles driven by active Shahed-class drone attacks.

Anduril unveiled Pulsar at the World Defense Show in Riyadh — a tripod-mounted electronic warfare system providing 360-degree RF detection and jamming against small drones. The system is self-contained and portable, designed for rapid deployment without integration into existing air defence networks. The venue and timing are calculated: Riyadh's biennial show is the Gulf's primary defence procurement event, and the region is under active drone and missile attack from the Iran conflict.

The demand signal is concrete. The UAE has intercepted over 1,350 drones and 230 missiles since hostilities began; Israel reports over 500 drones and 290 missiles launched against it. Gulf states need point-defence counter-drone systems that deploy in hours, not months. Pulsar targets the gap between integrated systems like Patriot — effective but expensive, slow to reposition, and designed for larger threats — and handheld RF jammers carried by individual soldiers, which lack the range and automation to protect fixed sites. The counter-UAV market, valued at $4.93 billion in 2025, is projected to reach $36.42 billion by 2035 at 22.14% CAGR according to GlobeNewswire research — and Gulf procurement is a disproportionate share of near-term growth.

The commercial logic ties directly to . Anduril's pitch bundles Pulsar with the C2 platform now designated as the Pentagon's counter-drone standard. For Gulf buyers evaluating interoperability with US forces — a consistent procurement criterion for Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Bahrain — a system feeding into the command layer used by American counter-drone units carries weight that a standalone jammer from a smaller vendor does not. Anduril is selling a network position, not just a hardware product.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Anduril brought a new drone-jamming device to an arms show in Saudi Arabia specifically because Gulf countries are under active drone attack and want to buy defensive technology fast. The device — called Pulsar — sits on a tripod and disrupts the radio signals controlling enemy drones within a 360-degree radius. The timing was deliberate. Countries under active attack buy defence equipment far faster than countries running peacetime procurement reviews. By showing up with an off-the-shelf product during a live threat, Anduril is converting a regional crisis into a contract opportunity — before the urgency fades and normal evaluation timelines reassert themselves.

Deep Analysis
Synthesis

Pulsar's Riyadh launch illustrates a commercial model unique to active-conflict procurement: the demonstration-to-contract cycle collapses when buyers face live threats. Anduril is applying a ship-and-iterate philosophy to defence hardware. Pulsar was launched publicly before independent performance verification, on the logic that a deployed system attracting urgent buyers can be refined faster than a perfected system awaiting a peacetime request for proposals.

Root Causes

Gulf states' counter-drone architecture was designed around two threat tiers: high-end ballistic missiles addressed by Patriot and THAAD, and aircraft threats addressed by fighter interceptors. The Shahed-type one-way attack drone exploits the gap between these tiers. It is too cheap and numerous for cost-effective Patriot intercepts, and too small for fighter engagement at scale. Pulsar targets this architectural gap directly — one that Israeli systems such as Drone Dome partially fill but cannot address at Gulf-scale drone volumes.

Escalation

Gulf state counter-drone procurement has shifted from a planning exercise to an emergency acquisition cycle. Active-conflict procurement compresses evaluation timelines from 18–24 months to weeks — a dynamic that historically favours vendors with deployable, tested products over developmental programmes. The UAE's 1,350+ interceptions indicate threat volumes that structurally exceed existing point-defence capacity, sustaining procurement urgency beyond a single conflict event.

What could happen next?
  • Opportunity

    Active conflict in the Gulf creates a procurement urgency window that may allow Anduril to win contracts months ahead of normal evaluation timelines.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Consequence

    Pulsar's entry into the Gulf market directly competes with established Israeli electronic warfare counter-drone systems, potentially disrupting procurement relationships built over a decade.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Risk

    Deploying an unverified system during an active conflict creates significant reputational risk if Pulsar's field performance does not match its launch positioning.

    Immediate · Suggested
  • Precedent

    A successful Pulsar Gulf contract would validate the active-conflict go-to-market model for US defence technology companies, incentivising similar crisis-timed product launches by competitors.

    Medium term · Suggested
Sources:Breaking Defense·New Vision
First Reported In

Update #2 · UK startup tops Pentagon's drone gauntlet

Breaking Defense· 19 Mar 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
Anduril
Anduril
Anduril views consolidated procurement as enabling rapid scaling — the $20 billion enterprise contract replaces 120 separate Army contracts with a single vehicle. Arsenal-1's early opening positions it to argue manufacturing readiness that CCA competitors cannot yet demonstrate.
Ukrainian drone manufacturers
Ukrainian drone manufacturers
Ukrainian firms have battle-tested interceptors priced at $2,100–$2,500 per unit and demand from 11 nations, but the wartime export ban forces partnerships with Western firms rather than direct sales.
IISS
IISS
IISS characterises drone innovation in the Russo-Ukrainian war as adaptation within existing military paradigms rather than a transformation of warfare — a more cautious assessment than the Pentagon's procurement urgency suggests.
US Pentagon, Anduril and Shield AI
US Pentagon, Anduril and Shield AI
The Pentagon awarded Anduril a $20 billion enterprise vehicle and confirmed Gauntlet II's live EW red team, prioritising procurement speed over competition; Anduril began YFQ-44A production four months early. Shield AI countered by raising $2 billion and validating Hivemind on a European airframe, betting multi-platform interoperability hedges against Anduril's platform lock.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Ukraine
Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Ukraine
Zelenskyy publicly disclosed that 10 shadow drone factories have been built abroad to circumvent Ukraine's wartime export ban, signed 10-year defence deals with Saudi Arabia and Qatar, and deployed 228 specialists across five Gulf states. The disclosure is a calculated signal that the ban is fracturing and Kyiv is seeking revenue structures independent of Western aid.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia signed a 10-year defence deal with Ukraine and accepted the deployment of Ukrainian counter-drone specialists the US declined to partner on in August 2025. The Gulf pivot reflects Riyadh's assessment that Ukrainian combat-proven doctrine at $2,500 per interceptor is more cost-effective than Patriot-dependent air defence.