12JUN

ANAC misses ruling; Malago vote runs

3 min read

09:25UTC

Italy's anti-corruption authority let a 15 June deadline lapse without ruling on Giovanni Malago's eligibility, leaving him to contest the 22 June federation presidency with the question open.

← Back to Mexico finally win an opener, on the ninth try Jump to analysis ↓

SportDeveloping

Key takeaway

ANAC's missed deadline lets Malago contest the FIGC vote with his eligibility unresolved and no body left to block it.

ANAC, Italy's National Anti-Corruption Authority, let a 15 June deadline pass without ruling on whether Giovanni Malago is eligible to stand for the FIGC (Italian Football Federation) presidency ¹. The question turns on a three-year revolving-door rule barring senior officials from moving straight into related posts. Malago is the former head of CONI (Italy's National Olympic Committee) and the Serie A-backed front-runner for the federation's top job.

CONI had already stepped aside as arbiter , leaving ANAC as the only body able to rule on Malago's eligibility. With ANAC silent past 15 June, nothing now stands between Malago and the 22 June ballot. Italian outlets describe him as running with the dossier still open.

Malago can now win the FIGC presidency on 22 June and then face a challenge to that win afterwards, with the eligibility question unanswered rather than resolved by ANAC. A post-election dispute would leave Italian football's governing body open to a contested mandate at the moment its new president takes office, inheriting a €5.5 billion debt file that requires parliamentary cooperation to address. The regulator that could have settled the matter before the vote instead allowed the vote to define the problem it will then have to rule on.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Italy's football federation, the FIGC, is holding a presidential election on 22 June. Giovanni Malago, who served four terms as president of Italy's Olympic Committee (CONI) from 2013 to 2025, is the front-runner, backed by 18 of 20 Serie A clubs. Italian law has a revolving-door rule: if you ran one sports body, you have to wait three years before moving to run another one you previously oversaw. Malago left CONI in mid-2025 and wants to become FIGC president about one year later, which is shorter than the three-year waiting period. Italy's anti-corruption authority ANAC was supposed to rule by 15 June on whether Malago could legally stand. They missed the deadline without explanation. CONI has already stepped back from giving an opinion. So the election will go ahead with the eligibility question unresolved. Malago could win on 22 June and then face a legal challenge afterwards that tries to overturn the result.

Source Landscape

This story draws on neutral-leaning sources

Primary parallel: French football's 2011 Ligue de Football Professionnel presidential election produced the most instructive European precedent. Jacques-Henri Eyraud stood for the LFP presidency while facing a separate governance review by the French National Olympic Committee.

The CNOSF did not rule before the election; Eyraud won; CNOSF subsequently found him ineligible; the LFP held a second election five months later. The structural parallel to the FIGC situation is close: a regulatory vacuum, a missed deadline, and an election that proceeded anyway.

Counter-parallel: The 2019 election for the Royal Spanish Football Federation (RFEF) presidency saw Luis Rubiales stand while a financial transparency investigation was pending. The investigation did not resolve before the election; Rubiales won; the investigation eventually produced a fine but no post-election annulment. Pending investigations do not automatically invalidate elections whose results are supported by a decisive majority of the relevant constituent assembly.

Consensus view: Gazzetta dello Sport's legal correspondent Michele Rubechi assessed on 16 June that ANAC's silence is procedurally ambiguous under Italian administrative law. Article 21 of the Italian Anti-Corruption Authority Act allows ANAC to issue non-binding opinions within 30 days of receiving a formal request; the 15 June deadline was set by Sports Minister Andrea Abodi's letter of 4 June, not by statute.

ANAC's failure to respond by Abodi's deadline is therefore not a regulatory failure but a bureaucratic decision not to prioritise a non-statutory request. Without an ANAC opinion before 22 June, Malago's candidacy proceeds to the ballot unchallenged by the authority that was asked to rule.

Counter-view: Il Sole 24 Ore's governance editor argued that ANAC's silence reflects a calculated refusal to enter a dispute with political dimensions before the World Cup stage had set its outcome: had ANAC ruled Malago ineligible days before the 22 June election, the authority would have absorbed the political fallout. Silence transfers the governance risk to the FIGC's electoral process, which now faces the prospect of having to unwind a result after the fact.

Key tension: Whether a post-election eligibility challenge by ANAC, CONI, or a rival candidate would have sufficient legal standing to annul a FIGC presidential result supported by 18 of 20 Serie A clubs.

Sources:Calcio e Finanza

Mentions:ANAC →Giovanni Malagò →FIGC →CONI →Italy →Andrea Abodi →World Cup →Gazzetta dello Sport →Serie A →

First Reported In

Update #21 · Three records fall in one afternoon

Calcio e Finanza· 17 Jun 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

Caused by

CONI steps aside; ANAC alone rules on Malagò

CONI stepping aside left ANAC as sole arbiter of Malago's eligibility, making the 15 June deadline ANAC's alone to enforce or miss.

Occurred 12 Jun 2026

Read story →

This Event

ANAC misses ruling; Malago vote runs

A regulator's silence, rather than a decision, now determines whether the front-runner can stand, with no body left to stop the ballot.

Led to

ANAC clears Malago for FIGC vote

ANAC's missed 15 June deadline on Malago eligibility (ID:4289) was resolved three days later when the authority ruled him eligible.

Occurred 18 Jun 2026

Read story →

Italy votes for a FIGC president

ANAC's earlier missed eligibility deadline (ID:4289) had left the FIGC election in legal limbo; the clearance in this window resolved that.

Occurred 20 Jun 2026

Read story →

Different Perspectives

French Football Federation

The FFF called an 11:00 CEST press conference for 28 July, at its Paris headquarters, following an extraordinary executive committee meeting, at which Zinedine Zidane is expected to be presented as head coach succeeding Didier Deschamps. As of this writing no communique confirms the appointment, contract length or start date.

Morocco

Morocco is pushing for the 2030 final at its Grand Stade Hassan II in Casablanca, a planned 115,000-seat venue that would be the world's largest football stadium on completion. The venue is contested by a Spanish petition for the Santiago Bernabeu, and FIFA has fixed neither the venue nor the tournament's proposed 64-team format.

FIFA

FIFA's first tournament report, published 27 July, itemises nearly 300,000 accredited personnel, 73,700 security staff and 300,000 square metres of custom-grown turf, with no revenue or cost figure attached. As a Swiss association answering to its own Congress rather than a treasury, FIFA has followed the same operational-before-financial sequence it used after Qatar 2022.

Javier Tebas / La Liga

La Liga president Javier Tebas said on 21 July that FIFA's system is rotten from the root and that Gianni Infantino's time as president has, in his words, concluded. Tebas has no vote in FIFA's process, so days after the IOC declined jurisdiction over a separate ethics complaint, he used the only instrument he has.

Mexico City government

Head of government Clara Brugada presented a closing report on 22 July crediting the tournament with 44 billion pesos of economic activity, 2,000-plus accelerated public works and 100,000 formal jobs in June alone. The city has not published the method behind that figure, and three other Mexican bodies count the same five weeks differently.

Town of Foxborough

Foxborough answered Kraft Group's June lawsuit on 7 July with a 61-page counterclaim, calling the stadium's owners 'a collection of multibillion-dollar corporations' trying to shift its $7.8 million security bill onto taxpayers. The town says its licensing power and its billing power run through the same board, and it wants the court to award its own costs too.