29MAY

ANAC misses ruling; Malago vote runs

3 min read

15:10UTC

Italy's anti-corruption authority let a 15 June deadline lapse without ruling on Giovanni Malago's eligibility, leaving him to contest the 22 June federation presidency with the question open.

← Back to Squads land, subpoenas follow Jump to analysis ↓

SportDeveloping

Key takeaway

ANAC's missed deadline lets Malago contest the FIGC vote with his eligibility unresolved and no body left to block it.

ANAC, Italy's National Anti-Corruption Authority, let a 15 June deadline pass without ruling on whether Giovanni Malago is eligible to stand for the FIGC (Italian Football Federation) presidency ¹. The question turns on a three-year revolving-door rule barring senior officials from moving straight into related posts. Malago is the former head of CONI (Italy's National Olympic Committee) and the Serie A-backed front-runner for the federation's top job.

CONI had already stepped aside as arbiter , leaving ANAC as the only body able to rule on Malago's eligibility. With ANAC silent past 15 June, nothing now stands between Malago and the 22 June ballot. Italian outlets describe him as running with the dossier still open.

Malago can now win the FIGC presidency on 22 June and then face a challenge to that win afterwards, with the eligibility question unanswered rather than resolved by ANAC. A post-election dispute would leave Italian football's governing body open to a contested mandate at the moment its new president takes office, inheriting a €5.5 billion debt file that requires parliamentary cooperation to address. The regulator that could have settled the matter before the vote instead allowed the vote to define the problem it will then have to rule on.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Italy's football federation, the FIGC, is holding a presidential election on 22 June. Giovanni Malago, who served four terms as president of Italy's Olympic Committee (CONI) from 2013 to 2025, is the front-runner, backed by 18 of 20 Serie A clubs. Italian law has a revolving-door rule: if you ran one sports body, you have to wait three years before moving to run another one you previously oversaw. Malago left CONI in mid-2025 and wants to become FIGC president about one year later, which is shorter than the three-year waiting period. Italy's anti-corruption authority ANAC was supposed to rule by 15 June on whether Malago could legally stand. They missed the deadline without explanation. CONI has already stepped back from giving an opinion. So the election will go ahead with the eligibility question unresolved. Malago could win on 22 June and then face a legal challenge afterwards that tries to overturn the result.

Source Landscape

This story draws on neutral-leaning sources

Primary parallel: French football's 2011 Ligue de Football Professionnel presidential election produced the most instructive European precedent. Jacques-Henri Eyraud stood for the LFP presidency while facing a separate governance review by the French National Olympic Committee.

The CNOSF did not rule before the election; Eyraud won; CNOSF subsequently found him ineligible; the LFP held a second election five months later. The structural parallel to the FIGC situation is close: a regulatory vacuum, a missed deadline, and an election that proceeded anyway.

Counter-parallel: The 2019 election for the Royal Spanish Football Federation (RFEF) presidency saw Luis Rubiales stand while a financial transparency investigation was pending. The investigation did not resolve before the election; Rubiales won; the investigation eventually produced a fine but no post-election annulment. Pending investigations do not automatically invalidate elections whose results are supported by a decisive majority of the relevant constituent assembly.

Consensus view: Gazzetta dello Sport's legal correspondent Michele Rubechi assessed on 16 June that ANAC's silence is procedurally ambiguous under Italian administrative law. Article 21 of the Italian Anti-Corruption Authority Act allows ANAC to issue non-binding opinions within 30 days of receiving a formal request; the 15 June deadline was set by Sports Minister Andrea Abodi's letter of 4 June, not by statute.

ANAC's failure to respond by Abodi's deadline is therefore not a regulatory failure but a bureaucratic decision not to prioritise a non-statutory request. Without an ANAC opinion before 22 June, Malago's candidacy proceeds to the ballot unchallenged by the authority that was asked to rule.

Counter-view: Il Sole 24 Ore's governance editor argued that ANAC's silence reflects a calculated refusal to enter a dispute with political dimensions before the World Cup stage had set its outcome: had ANAC ruled Malago ineligible days before the 22 June election, the authority would have absorbed the political fallout. Silence transfers the governance risk to the FIGC's electoral process, which now faces the prospect of having to unwind a result after the fact.

Key tension: Whether a post-election eligibility challenge by ANAC, CONI, or a rival candidate would have sufficient legal standing to annul a FIGC presidential result supported by 18 of 20 Serie A clubs.

Sources:Calcio e Finanza

Mentions:ANAC →Giovanni Malagò →FIGC →CONI →Italy →Andrea Abodi →World Cup →Gazzetta dello Sport →Serie A →

First Reported In

Update #21 · Three records fall in one afternoon

Calcio e Finanza· 17 Jun 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

Caused by

CONI steps aside; ANAC alone rules on Malagò

CONI stepping aside left ANAC as sole arbiter of Malago's eligibility, making the 15 June deadline ANAC's alone to enforce or miss.

Occurred 12 Jun 2026

Read story →

This Event

ANAC misses ruling; Malago vote runs

A regulator's silence, rather than a decision, now determines whether the front-runner can stand, with no body left to stop the ballot.

Led to

ANAC clears Malago for FIGC vote

ANAC's missed 15 June deadline on Malago eligibility (ID:4289) was resolved three days later when the authority ruled him eligible.

Occurred 18 Jun 2026

Read story →

Italy votes for a FIGC president

ANAC's earlier missed eligibility deadline (ID:4289) had left the FIGC election in legal limbo; the clearance in this window resolved that.

Occurred 20 Jun 2026

Read story →

Different Perspectives

Spain

Spain face France on Tuesday for the second semi-final place, the last unresolved tie in the bracket.

France

France already through to the other semi-final, await Tuesday's result against Spain to know who plays the England-Argentina winner in the final.

Switzerland

Switzerland reached their first World Cup quarter-final since 1954 and led Argentina before Breel Embolo's second yellow card left them a man down for the last half-hour. They expect the run to raise expectations for the next cycle rather than close a chapter.

Norway

Norway leaned on Erling Haaland to reach a first modern-era quarter-final, and he nearly took them further before a disallowed goal and England's late double ended the run. Their tournament closes as the best World Cup performance in the country's history.

Argentina national team

Argentina broke down a 10-man Switzerland late, extending Scaloni's run of reaching every semi-final he has managed since 2019. Messi will make his first World Cup appearance against England, a fixture Argentine coverage framed around that unbroken run rather than the personal narrative.

England

England needed a 93rd-minute Bellingham winner to see off Norway, the third straight knockout tie settled in its closing stages rather than controlled. They travel to Atlanta as favourites but with Declan Rice a fitness doubt and Jarell Quansah suspended.