
SRP
Arizona public utility co-serving Mesa; offers 18-24 month large-load connections alongside APS for Phoenix metro data centres.
Last refreshed: 6 May 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic
How does SRP's public-utility structure give Mesa data centres an edge over APS-served sites?
Timeline for SRP
Cited alongside APS for competitive large-load connection windows in Arizona
Data Centres: Boom and Backlash: Where the next data centres should goWhat is SRP and how does it differ from APS for data centres?
What territory does Salt River Project serve in Arizona?
Is Salt River Project regulated by the Arizona Corporation Commission?
Background
SRP (Salt River Project) is one of the two utilities serving the Mesa, Arizona data-centre corridor, alongside APS (Arizona Public Service). Together they offer operators 18-24 month large-load connection windows and solar PPAs at $20-25/MWh — conditions that place the Phoenix metro fifth on the global siting shortlist for 2026. SRP serves the eastern portions of the Phoenix metro area, including substantial portions of Mesa, Tempe, and Scottsdale, covering approximately 1 million electric customers.
SRP is a public utility — technically an agricultural improvement and power district — founded in 1903 and wholly publicly owned, with governance by elected directors. It is not subject to Arizona Corporation Commission rate regulation that applies to investor-owned utilities like APS. This regulatory difference means SRP can price its electricity and adjust connection processes without going through the same rate-case proceedings, giving it some operational flexibility that APS lacks. SRP operates the Roosevelt Dam system and has substantial hydropower alongside thermal and renewable generation.
The same water-stress risk that applies to APS applies to SRP: the Phoenix metro sits at WRI "high" to "extremely high" water stress, with Colorado River allocation reductions under active review. SRP's agricultural-district origins make it directly involved in irrigation water management, giving it an unusual institutional stake in the water-rights debate that data-centre cooling-tower consumption is aggravating.