
RCM Hill LLC
The Texas developer suing Hill County for $100m over its data-centre moratorium.
Last refreshed: 7 July 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic
Why is one Texas lawsuit shaping how other counties draft data-centre moratoriums?
Timeline for RCM Hill LLC
Mentioned in: Santa Fe drops the bar to 1 MW
Data Centres: Boom and BacklashFiled a $100 million federal lawsuit alleging unconstitutional taking and retained the active suit after rescission
Data Centres: Boom and Backlash: Hill County folds, lawsuit lives onFiled $100m taking suit against Hill County challenging the moratorium on 28 May
Data Centres: Boom and Backlash: Texas developer sues county over pauseBackground
RCM Hill LLC is a Texas-based data-centre development company formed to build Project Aquila, a 1,235 MW campus planned across more than 800 acres of Hill County farmland. It holds a large-load interconnection slot in ERCOT's grid queue and has no documented business activity outside the Aquila project.
RCM Hill LLC filed a $100 million federal lawsuit against Hill County, Texas on 28 May 2026, arguing that the county's moratorium on its Project Aquila campus was an unconstitutional regulatory taking under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments and the Texas Constitution. Hill County's commissioners court voted unanimously to rescind the moratorium on 4 June 2026, seven days later, and adopted new review requirements covering water use, traffic, noise and public notification in its place. RCM Hill's federal claim remains active regardless; it is still seeking a court declaration that the moratorium was unlawful, injunctive relief and damages.
The company spent more than 16 months assembling land agreements worth over $80 million across four landowners and holds an ERCOT large-load interconnection slot requiring a $61.75 million deposit by 24 July 2026 to avoid forfeiture. Its legal theory rests on Texas counties' narrow Dillon's-Rule authority: unlike Texas cities, counties hold no general zoning power and can regulate land use only where the legislature has expressly granted it. County Judge Shane Brassell called the 12 May 2026 moratorium vote illegal from the bench, and county attorney David Holmes warned commissioners in advance that they lacked the authority to enact it; the vote passed 3-2 regardless.
The case has become the reference point other jurisdictions weigh before legislating a pause. Santa Fe County, New Mexico's 18-month moratorium approved on 2 July 2026, the lowest threshold this topic has tracked at one megawatt, rests on the county's established water and environmental review powers rather than an ad hoc land-use freeze, the kind of statutory footing Hill County's moratorium conspicuously lacked. RCM Hill v. Hill County is now cited as the cautionary example of what happens when a moratorium is enacted without express legislative authority.