
Peter McCrory
Anthropic researcher whose work measures AI's real impact on employment and hiring.
Last refreshed: 30 March 2026
Can an AI company's own researchers produce unbiased evidence of AI's effect on jobs?
Timeline for Peter McCrory
Introduced 'observed exposure' to measure AI's labour-market impact
AI: Jobs, Power & Money: AI exposure highest among educated womenMentioned in: AEI: AI is an equaliser, not a destroyer
AI: Jobs, Power & MoneyCited as Dallas Fed found employment down ~1% in top AI-exposed sectors
AI: Jobs, Power & Money: AI job losses concentrate in under-25sWho is Peter McCrory?
What is observed exposure in AI labour research?
Has AI actually caused unemployment?
Background
Peter McCrory is an economist and researcher at Anthropic, specialising in the empirical measurement of AI's effects on labour markets. Working alongside Maxim Massenkoff, he developed "observed exposure": a methodology using real professional Claude usage to gauge actual AI displacement risk, rather than theoretical task-coverage models.
McCrory and Massenkoff's research found that computer programmers face 75% task coverage by AI tools, computer and maths occupations 35.8%, and office and administrative roles 34.3%. Workers in the most exposed roles are statistically older, more educated, and higher-paid. Their data showed no systematic unemployment increase among heavily exposed occupations since late 2022, though suggestive evidence points to slowing hiring of younger workers .
The research sits at the centre of a contested policy debate. The American Enterprise Institute cited similar findings when rebutting claims that AI worsens inequality, while the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas independently found employment down roughly 1% in the most AI-exposed industries, concentrated among workers under 25 . McCrory's methodology is unusual: an AI company producing the most credible evidence about its own technology's labour-market effects.