Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Labour Inspectorate (Georgia)
OrganisationGE

Labour Inspectorate (Georgia)

Georgian government body enforcing Law 1509's fine ladder; no enforcement data published as of May 2026.

Last refreshed: 8 May 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic

Key Question

Has Georgia's Labour Inspectorate actually fined any foreigners since Law 1509 took effect?

Timeline for Labour Inspectorate (Georgia)

#31 May

Published no fine, inspection or sector breakdown one week after 1 May activation

Nomads & Communities: Georgia activates Law 1509 fines, publishes nothing
View full timeline →
Follow Nomads & Communities →
Common Questions
Has Georgia's Labour Inspectorate issued any fines to foreigners under Law 1509?
No public fine count had been published as of 8 May 2026, one week after the fine ladder activated.Source: Pravda Georgia
How much can Georgia's Labour Inspectorate fine a foreign worker in 2026?
2,000 GEL (~$740) first offence; 4,000 GEL for a repeat within 12 months; 12,000 GEL (~$4,440) for third and subsequent breaches.Source: Pravda Georgia
Can Georgia's Labour Inspectorate inspect a foreign worker's home without warning?
Law 1509 grants unannounced inspection authority; the specific procedures were not clarified in public guidance as of May 2026.

Background

Georgia's Labour Inspectorate is the state body responsible for workplace inspection and enforcement of employment law, including the new work-permit compliance regime under Law No.1509. From 1 May 2026, the Inspectorate gained authority to issue fines: 2,000 GEL (~$740) for first offences, 4,000 GEL for repeats within twelve months, and 12,000 GEL (~$4,440) for third and subsequent breaches.

One week after the fine ladder activated, neither the Inspectorate nor Georgia's Ministry of Internal Affairs had published a fine count, inspection count or sector breakdown. This absence of data mirrors the Hungary 2018-2020 pattern: enforcement capacity is credibly visible while prosecution dockets remain invisible, producing a chilling effect on foreign-resident behaviour without requiring a headline-generating case.

The Inspectorate's authority over Sub-clause T — the short-term professional activity exemption — is unclear because the implementing decree for Sub-clause T has not been published. This means the Inspectorate enforces Law 1509 without one of the nomad-relevant exemptions being legally operable, leaving the boundary between a permitted foreign-employer remote worker and a fineable unauthorised local worker entirely at inspector discretion.