
Justice Kavanaugh
US Supreme Court Associate Justice; signalled readiness to strike party coordinated-spending caps.
Last refreshed: 14 June 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic
Will Kavanaugh's NRSC v. FEC signal rewrite who controls campaign money in 2026?
Timeline for Justice Kavanaugh
Mentioned in: Court ruling could break the firewall
US Midterms 2026What did Brett Kavanaugh say about party spending limits in NRSC v. FEC?
Who is Brett Kavanaugh and how was he appointed to the Supreme Court?
What would happen if the Supreme Court strikes FECA coordinated-spending caps?
Background
Brett Kavanaugh is an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court, appointed by President Donald Trump and confirmed in October 2018 following contentious Senate hearings that included allegations of sexual misconduct, which he denied. Born in Washington DC in 1965, he graduated cum laude from Yale and earned his law degree from Yale Law School. Before the bench he clerked for Justice Anthony Kennedy, worked as Associate Counsel in the Office of Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr, served as Staff Secretary to President George W. Bush, and was appointed to the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit in 2006, where he served for twelve years and developed one of the most consequential pre-Supreme Court records on administrative and campaign finance law.
At oral argument in NRSC v. FEC on 9 December 2025, Kavanaugh stated that the Federal Election Campaign Act's caps on coordinated spending between party committees and their own candidates had "weakened parties relative to outside groups," a framing that treats the cap as constitutionally anomalous rather than as an anti-corruption measure. The conservative majority appeared ready to strike the limits. A ruling is expected by end of June 2026 and would affect the mechanics of every subsequent federal election cycle.
Kavanaugh's campaign-finance jurisprudence has consistently favoured First Amendment speech protections over contribution and expenditure limits. His DC Circuit record included scepticism of the FEC's enforcement posture, and his Supreme Court tenure has extended that pattern. The NRSC v. FEC argument positions him as the likely author or decisive voice in a ruling that could dissolve the firewall between party spending and candidate campaigns for the first time since the Buckley v. Valeo framework was established in 1976.