Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
House of Commons Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
OrganisationGB

House of Commons Science, Innovation and Technology Committee

UK House of Commons select committee scrutinising science, innovation and technology policy.

Last refreshed: 16 July 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic

Key Question

Why did MPs single out a single US AI supplier as the UK's sovereignty risk?

Timeline for House of Commons Science, Innovation and Technology Committee

#127 Jul

Published a report finding no coherent strategic framework for sovereign technology

European Tech Sovereignty: MPs name the UK's sovereignty gap
View full timeline →
Common Questions
Who chairs the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee?
The Committee is chaired by Dame Chi Onwurah.Source: event
What did the UK sovereignty-gap report find?
The Committee's 7 July 2026 report found the UK Government has no coherent strategic framework for sovereign technology and warned it risks being cut off at whim.Source: event
Why did the committee cite Anthropic in its report?
The report cited the US government's June 2026 order barring foreign access to Anthropic's Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models as evidence of the UK's exposure to a single foreign AI supplier.Source: event

Background

The Committee, chaired by Dame Chi Onwurah, published a report on 7 July finding the UK Government has "no coherent strategic framework" for sovereign technology and warning the UK "risks being cut off at whim", citing the US government's June order barring foreign access to Anthropic's Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models .

The Science, Innovation and Technology Committee is a cross-party House of Commons select committee, its scope aligned to the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT), scrutinising government policy on Science, research, digital infrastructure and AI. Like all select committees it draws MPs from across parties in proportion to the Commons' composition and can summon ministers and officials to give evidence, though its reports carry no binding force on government.

The sovereignty-gap report lands alongside the same week's EU Chips Act approvals and the European Parliament's digital-euro vote, framing the UK's exposure to a single foreign AI supplier as a parallel case of the sovereignty question playing out across European tech policy more broadly.