Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Georgetown Law School
OrganisationUS

Georgetown Law School

Washington DC law school with leading national-security and AUMF constitutional expertise.

Last refreshed: 26 April 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic

Key Question

Can the US president strike Iran without a new AUMF, and what do Georgetown's war-powers scholars say?

Timeline for Georgetown Law School

View full timeline →
Follow Iran Conflict 2026 →
Common Questions
What is Georgetown Law School's expertise in national security law?
Georgetown Law Center has one of the US's largest national-security law faculties, including experts in war powers, AUMF interpretation, and International humanitarian law. Its National Security Law Program produces practitioner-focused research and supplies alumni to government.
Does the US need a new AUMF to attack Iran?
Georgetown national-security scholars have argued the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs do not clearly authorise military action against Iran; the War Powers Resolution would require congressional authorisation within 60 days of any sustained campaign.Source: event
What does the War Powers Resolution say about attacking Iran?
The 1973 War Powers Resolution requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces and to obtain congressional authorisation within 60 days. Critics argue it has never been robustly enforced, but a Senate AUMF draft signals some Republicans want a statutory basis.

Background

Georgetown University Law Center is one of the United States' most prominent law schools, headquartered in Washington DC and renowned for its concentration of faculty and research in national security law, international law, and constitutional war powers. Its location in the US capital — a short distance from the Capitol and federal agencies — gives it unique access to policymakers and makes it a primary supplier of expert commentary on legal questions arising from US military engagements.

In the 2026 Iran conflict, Georgetown Law scholars featured prominently in media and congressional testimony on the constitutional and statutory dimensions of a proposed Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) against Iran. Key questions on which Georgetown faculty provided analysis included whether existing AUMFs (2001, 2002) could be stretched to cover Iran operations, whether the War Powers Resolution required congressional authorisation, and what the Senate draft text from Senator Murkowski would and would not authorise.

The school's Institute for International Law and Politics and National Security Law Program run practitioner-focused clinics and publish widely on war powers doctrine. Georgetown Law alumni include a disproportionate share of senior US national-security attorneys in both executive and legislative branches, giving its institutional positions unusual downstream influence on legal frameworks adopted by government.

Source Material
National Security Law Program — Georgetown Law