Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
Alaskans for Mary v. Dahlstrom
AI-generated illustration
EventUS

Alaskans for Mary v. Dahlstrom

Peltola campaign's 2026 public records suit seeking Alaska's absentee ballot reject codes.

Senator Dan S. Sullivan's campaign moved to join the case on 9 November and Judge Thomas Matthews set a hearing for 10 November, the night Mary Peltola's lead reached 4,250 first choices before Alaska's 18 November ranked-choice tabulation.

Last refreshed: 11 November 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic

Timeline for Alaskans for Mary v. Dahlstrom

View full timeline →

Background

The complaint seeks declaratory and injunctive relief under the Alaska Public Records Act. The defendants are Lieutenant Governor Nancy Dahlstrom, who oversees Alaska's elections, Division of Elections director Carol Beecher and the Division itself.

Alaska's lawyers replied that the Act cannot force the state to produce a record it does not hold in the form asked for, and that releasing the codes would intrude on voters' constitutional right to privacy. The state made that privacy argument in the separate suit over Alaska's voter list. Alaska gives voters no way to fix minor defects on absentee ballots, and about 1,303 were rejected in the 2024 general election.

Reject codes matter because absentee ballots can swing a close Alaska count. Peltola led by 0.3 points on polling night, 48.2% to 47.9%, and the Senate seat goes to a ranked-choice tabulation on 18 November.

Key Issues
Common Questions

Reference

What is Alaskans for Mary v. Dahlstrom?
A public records suit filed by Mary Peltola's campaign on 6 November 2026, seeking The Register of absentee ballots with each accept and reject code.Source: Complaint, Alaskans for Mary v. Dahlstrom
Has a judge ruled in the Peltola absentee ballot case?
No ruling had been reported by 11 November. Judge Thomas Matthews heard the case on 10 November.Source: Anchorage Daily News
Why is Mary Peltola suing Alaska's election officials?
Her campaign wants to see which absentee ballots were rejected and why. The state says the law does not require the data in that form and that release would breach voter privacy.Source: Anchorage Daily News
Source Material

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Updated 11 November 2026. Editorial standards.