Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
European Oil Markets
15JUN

CENTCOM redirections rise to 61, disabled count holds at four

4 min read
11:33UTC

Three vessels added to the cumulative count since 7 May; smokestack-disabling pattern unchanged

EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

CENTCOM redirections rose to 61 by 10 May; the disabled-tanker count held at four with two still unnamed.

CENTCOM added three commercial vessels to its cumulative Iranian-port redirection count between 7 May and 10 May, taking the running figure to 61 . The pace has slowed from the early-blockade rhythm of one to two vessels per day to a roughly one-per-day tempo, suggesting that the dark-fleet Community has largely re-routed around the visible enforcement architecture or stopped sending tonnage into the corridor entirely.

The disabled-ship count held at four for the third straight day. The 8 May F/A-18 smokestack-disabling strikes against the tankers M/T Sea Star III and Sevda remain the most recent recorded immobilisations; the other two disabled vessels have not been publicly named by CENTCOM, an attribution gap that has now persisted for a fortnight despite repeated press-grid statements naming the operational pattern.

For Asian refiners the redirection figure translates to roughly two-to-four weeks of delivery delays on cargoes diverted from Bandar Abbas to alternative anchorages. For European buyers it shows up in the bid premium on Atlantic-basin barrels backfilling the lost volume. Brent's Monday Asian open at $104.71 set the prior $101.29 baseline is consistent with the market pricing that lost volume as a structural rather than transient gap.

The slowing tempo cuts against the U#90 framing that CENTCOM was scaling a sustained kinetic operation; the operational rhythm now looks more like enforcement maintenance than a widening engagement. The two-unnamed-tankers attribution gap is the open question: whether CENTCOM is holding the names for operational security, the targets are non-state-flagged dark-fleet vessels Washington does not wish to identify, or the War Powers Resolution documentation review is delaying public naming.

The operational floor under all of this is 20 US warships that Tribune India's ANI wire reported enforcing the strait, the largest sustained US naval presence in the Persian Gulf since 2003.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Think of the Strait of Hormuz as a single-lane motorway carrying about a fifth of the world's oil. The US Navy has been telling about two tankers a day to turn around if they were heading to Iranian ports, and the running total is now 61 since mid-April. Four tankers have actually been damaged. Two of those four have never been publicly named, which is unusual: usually the Navy says which ships it hit.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The cumulative redirection count is constrained by CENTCOM's standing order, which covers Iranian-port-destined traffic only and excludes the toll-interdiction track Trump posted to Truth Social on 12 April but never converted into a signed executive order.

The structural driver is the **War Powers Resolution** Section 1544(b) clock, which according to the Trump administration's 1 May formal position never started running because the United States is 'not at war' with Iran / U#85 framing. Without a signed AUMF, CENTCOM cannot broaden the operational rules to cover non-Iranian-port traffic in commercial vessels carrying Iranian-origin cargo; the standing order's narrow scope produces the slowing tempo.

The unnamed-tanker attribution gap is downstream of the same constraint: publishing the names risks creating a verification record that intersects with the pending Murkowski AUMF's reporting requirements (event 6).

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    Pace of CENTCOM redirections has slowed; analysts will watch for whether the running total reaches 75 by 17 May (one-per-day tempo) or stalls at 65 (target-depletion signal).

    Short term · Assessed
  • Meaning

    Two unnamed disabled tankers remain an attribution gap that may become a press-freedom or congressional-reporting story.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Meaning

    Without an AUMF, the standing order's narrow scope limits CENTCOM's ability to act against non-Iranian-port-destined traffic carrying Iranian cargo.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Meaning

    Atlantic-basin barrel-backfill demand may continue to keep WTI above $95 even if Brent eases back toward the $101 floor.

    Short term · Assessed
First Reported In

Update #94 · Tehran writes, Trump tweets, Brent breaks

ABC News· 11 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Sanctions compliance officer reviewing a Lukoil International GmbH bid
Sanctions compliance officer reviewing a Lukoil International GmbH bid
OFAC's amended FAQ 1224 gives a compliance desk its first published standard: full severance from Lukoil and a US-jurisdiction blocked account for sale proceeds. The conditions name neither ISAB nor Italy, so a Priolo Gargallo-linked bid answers a different question than a Neftochim Burgas or Petrotel Ploiesti one.
Managed-money funds on Brent Last Day
Managed-money funds on Brent Last Day
CFTC data for the week to 21 July showed managed money flipping 74,400 contracts to a net long of 15,665 against 1,410 short on the Brent Last Day contract, code 06765T. A fund that held that short through July has now covered it, and the spent short base raises the bar for the next leg higher.
Saudi crude exporters
Saudi crude exporters
Saudi-linked tanker transits through Bab el-Mandeb fell to about 7.5 a day after the 24 July underwriting withdrawal, pushing more barrels onto the longer route round the Cape or through the Yanbu terminal. Every diverted barrel ties up a ship for longer, and a fleet that turns slower charges more.
Tanker owners on the Bab el-Mandeb route
Tanker owners on the Bab el-Mandeb route
Lloyd's-market syndicates withdrew war-risk cover from Saudi-linked hulls on 24 July, leaving owners of that class of vessel to sail Bab el-Mandeb uninsured or not at all. Tanker transits on the route fell to roughly 7.5 a day, and cover, once withdrawn, does not return on a shipowner's timetable.
Eni
Eni
Eni's board approved second-quarter results on 29 July, swinging refining EBIT to a EUR0.08bn profit from a year-earlier loss even as group profit doubled, and named Red Sea freight cost as a cap on that improvement. A refiner absorbing higher shipping costs on Saudi-linked crude while its numbers improve treats the freight line as a drag, not a crisis.
Asian buyers (India, Japan, China, South Korea)
Asian buyers (India, Japan, China, South Korea)
Asian refiners are absorbing 62% of Yanbu's 3.75m b/d flow, the bulk of Saudi Arabia's rerouted crude now clearing east rather than into the Atlantic basin. That destination split leaves Asian buyers more exposed to any single Yanbu-specific disruption than under the kingdom's normal multi-terminal export pattern.