Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
Institute for Public Policy Research
AI-generated illustration
OrganisationGB

Institute for Public Policy Research

Centre-left think tank arguing joint defence procurement could free up borrowing headroom.

Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Timeline for Institute for Public Policy Research

#2 7 Aug

Argued joint procurement could create £3.4bn of borrowing headroom

Is Britain Actually Broke?: Adam Smith Institute puts top tax rate at 54%
View full timeline →

Background

The Institute for Public Policy Research, known as IPPR, is a UK centre-left think tank researching economic and social policy. On 6 August 2026 it argued that joint procurement and stockpiling with allies could create £3.4bn of borrowing headroom against a defence spending PATH to 3% of GDP by 2030, costed at about £13bn a year.

The proposal targets how defence spending is delivered, sharing procurement and stockpiling costs with allies, rather than how much is spent. It was published a day before the Adam Smith Institute argued that higher income tax rates would cut revenue, putting the two think tanks on opposite sides of the same week's fiscal debate.

Read together, the two interventions frame the live question behind the defence spending PATH: whether the money comes from efficiency, as IPPR argues, or would need tax rises the Adam Smith Institute says would be self-defeating.

Common Questions
what does the IPPR argue about defence spending?
It argues joint procurement and stockpiling with allies could create £3.4bn of borrowing headroom against a UK defence PATH to 3% of GDP by 2030.Source: Institute for Public Policy Research
what kind of organisation is the IPPR?
The Institute for Public Policy Research is a UK centre-left think tank researching economic and social policy.Source: Institute for Public Policy Research
when did the IPPR make its defence procurement argument?
It published the analysis on 6 August 2026, a day before the Adam Smith Institute's rival tax argument.Source: Institute for Public Policy Research
Source Material